Closed colemanja91 closed 4 years ago
@colemanja91 as @swanandp suggested this needs to be fixed with -v
. Would you mind improving your PR, so we can merge it in?
Seems that this is a duplicate of #191?
@Kulgar which one you think is better #191 or #201?
on a similar PR #48 @lpaulmp mentioned:
@DavidHuie Please can rebase this PR and make sure that it installs the last bundler by default?
@colemanja91 thanks for the PR!
For now, we will close this one, because after experimenting a bit more, we want to cover more flexibility.
You can add your feedback to #217 which we'll use as a basis to design a more complete solution.
Thank you anyway for your PR, which has helped the project move forward!
Bundler 2 is not backwards compatible with Bundler 1, so we need to specify a version. This keeps the default at the current version (2.0.1), but provides a variable for the user to configure.