Closed udondan closed 8 years ago
Thanks. This role hasn't been tested against Ansible 2.x yet.
Do you know if the new syntax is backwards compatible? My concern would be swapping things around and then everyone still using 1.x would be dead in the water.
It is now tested by me. :) Though not all features. I use this role as a dependency in one of my role like this:
galaxy_info:
dependencies: &dep
- name: rvm_io.rvm1-ruby
src: rvm_io.rvm1-ruby
version: v1.3.7
tags:
- rvm
become: yes
rvm1_rubies:
- ruby-2.2.1
dependencies: *dep
Other than the warning I didn't have any issues.
become
is available since, I think, Ansible 1.9, so even folks who still use Ansible 1 could use the role with become
. In fact, there was a problem in 1.9.x, since become
was introduced. If one was using become
on the role level (like in my example above) or on playbook level, Ansible would break and complain that become
and sudo
was mixed. So before I was forced to use sudo
instead of become
. This problem now is gone in Ansible 2 and only this warning is shown.
Ansible 2 is mostly backwards compatible. The syntax is completely the same. I have read they had changed how to use loops. Something like this:
with_items: rvm1_rubies
should rather be written as:
with_items: "{{ rvm1_rubies }}"
I updated that in my roles just to be on the safe side but actually the old notation was working as well.
I discovered a few bugs but as far as I can see you're not using the related modules or features.
You can get an overview of the changes in this video: https://www.ansible.com/webinar-on-demand-ansible-2 - I think this might have been where I read the change regarding loop-notations. Also, here is a note about the Ansible 2 release, containing some known issues: https://www.ansible.com/blog/ansible-2.0-launch.
+1 works with ansible 2.0.1.0 with deprecation warnings
Thanks for the updates.
I'm closing this issue as the last week was merged https://github.com/rvm/rvm1-ansible/pull/85 which resolve this.
When running a play which uses the rvm role this warning is shown:
Docs for privilege escalation