Closed solov-t closed 4 years ago
could you please remove the little sublime text line at the top? (i have exactly the same thing, but i think it's a good idea to not merge them into master). the only other thing i can spot is that section references seem to be done manually, instead of using \sref
— do you think you could possibly change these? it just then makes it a lot easier if we ever need to do something about all the references! 😇
Thanks for the quick response! I agree that taking the line of the top of the file seems best, but is there any way to do this automatically with git? I don't wanna keep forgetting to erase it.
I do use sref though (usually)! Did I forget it somewhere?
Ah, it was on the first paragraph. Let me change it and figure how to re-pull this.
not sure about automatically removing that first line to be honest... but, thinking about it, do you really need it? rather than building with sublime text, there's the custom makefile in this repo, so running make ega4
is how i've been building locally
I'm really bad at this! Haha. I'll try and see how to make "make" work on windows, but last time I've tried this all I got was a headache.
oh, i have no idea how it all works on windows, i must admit! good luck...
sorry to be picky, but just trying to make sure that everything is consistent in the master branch!
remarks
environment, but i think it's probably better to just use remark
, even when there are more than one, since this is what we've been doing so far (i think...? @ryankeleti ?).gitignore
to your local .gitignore
, i.e. the master branch .gitignore
doesn't need these sublime text details (this takes me back to the birth of this repo, when i had a massive nightmare trying to sort out not committing my local .gitignore
, so you have my sympathy)That's okay, consistency is important.
just gone back and realised that i used remark
instead of remarks
for EGA.II, so if we merge yours then i'll just note down somewhere that i need to go and fix this! but it's really not a very time consuming thing, so i have zero preference. @ryankeleti can have the deciding vote here ;-)
I don't have a preference either (or the deciding vote!), go ahead. as for \sref
s, I plan on moving sections to \sref
as well. There is really no reason to use \label{(sub)section:*}
as we have been, so I'll probably fix that soon