Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by mathieu.malaterre
on 14 Mar 2014 at 2:05
Indeed:
$ tiffinfo data/baseline/conformance/jp2_4.tif
TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 37724 (0x935c) encountered.
TIFF Directory at offset 0x8 (8)
Subfile Type: (0 = 0x0)
Image Width: 768 Image Length: 512
Resolution: 72, 72 pixels/inch
Bits/Sample: 8
Compression Scheme: LZW
Photometric Interpretation: RGB color
Samples/Pixel: 3
Rows/Strip: 3
Planar Configuration: single image plane
Photoshop Data: <present>, 3780 bytes
Tag 37724: 0x41,0x64,0x6f,0x62,0x65,0x20,0x50,0x68,0x6f,0x74,0x6f,0x73,0x68,0x6f,0x70,0x20,0x44,0x6f,0x63,0x75,0x6d,0x65,0x6e,0x74,0x20,0x44,0x61,0x74,0x61,0x20,0x42,0x6c,0x6f,0x63,0x6b,0x0
Predictor: horizontal differencing 2 (0x2)
while:
$ tiffinfo bin/tests/conformance/Temporary/file4.jp2.tif
TIFF Directory at offset 0x60008 (393224)
Image Width: 768 Image Length: 512
Bits/Sample: 8
Compression Scheme: None
Photometric Interpretation: min-is-black
Orientation: row 0 top, col 0 lhs
Samples/Pixel: 1
Rows/Strip: 1
Planar Configuration: single image plane
It would be so much easier is conformance was actually single channel
Original comment by mathieu.malaterre
on 14 Mar 2014 at 4:10
Same issue with file6:
http://my.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=14097531&build=581161
******Parameters*********
base_filename = /home/voxxl/Dashboards/MyTests/data/baseline/conformance/jp2_6.tif
test_filename = /home/voxxl/Dashboards/MyTests/openjpeg-continuous-linux_gcc47-trunk-debug/tests/conformance/Temporary/file6.jp2.tif
nb of Components = 3
Non regression test = 0
separator Base = _
separator Test = _
MSE values = [ 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 ]
PEAK values = [ 4.000000 4.000000 4.000000 ]
Non-regression test = 0
NbFilename to generate from base filename = 3
NbFilename to generate from test filename = 3
*************************
Step 1 -> Header comparison
ERROR: prec mismatch [comp 0] (8><16)
Original comment by mathieu.malaterre
on 14 Mar 2014 at 4:18
This issue was updated by revision r2754.
Original comment by mathieu.malaterre
on 17 Mar 2014 at 4:18
Original comment by mathieu.malaterre
on 24 Mar 2014 at 2:43
Original comment by anto...@gmail.com
on 24 Mar 2014 at 3:55
Original comment by mathieu.malaterre
on 24 Mar 2014 at 5:15
Original comment by anto...@gmail.com
on 27 Mar 2014 at 2:59
Same explanation as in issue 282.
In this case however, the test has to be adapted to consider only the first
component of the reference file (no downscaling of output needed).
Original comment by anto...@gmail.com
on 3 Apr 2014 at 3:43
This issue was updated by revision r2939.
Update issue 282
Original comment by m.darb...@gmail.com
on 22 Nov 2014 at 12:06
This issue was closed by revision r2940.
Original comment by m.darb...@gmail.com
on 22 Nov 2014 at 12:07
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mathieu.malaterre
on 13 Mar 2014 at 12:23