Closed aybabtme closed 7 years ago
Huh, that is strange. AFAIK this is not typical for MPL2, but being lenient in this case is probably a good thing.
WRT more formal parsing, my feeling is that it just becomes too expensive for this package. I am not opposed to it, but we would need to closely look at what we are gaining from it, and weigh that against the complexity and performance penalty we would likely incur.
Thanks!
For instance, in
github.com/hashicorp/go-sockaddr
the MPLv2 starts like:I think long term it'd be better to tokenize the licenses and do some sort of TF-IDF matching.