Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Wouldn't this be more of a data issue than a bug in MoNav?
If OpenStreetMap does not reflect reality, you should correct the data.
Original comment by veaac.fd...@gmail.com
on 10 Apr 2012 at 8:17
Sorry, this wasn't a very good expample. The offset there is hard to quantify,
and it's probably bigger in the map data than in reality.
Let me give a better expample. In the center of
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.888545&lon=9.159595&zoom=18&layers=M
coming along Göppinger Str, crossing Leinfeldener Str. The offset in the map
data is about 3 m, which is close to reality. It's about half the width of the
road. The situation can be seen in the aerial photo:
http://maps.google.de/maps?q=Ludwigsburg&hl=de&ie=UTF8&ll=48.888552,9.159409&spn
=0.001688,0.00342&sll=51.151786,10.415039&sspn=26.485995,56.030273&oq=ludw&hnear
=Ludwigsburg,+Stuttgart,+Baden-W%C3%BCrttemberg&t=h&z=19
I think most people would prefer to be guided 'straight' here. I imagine there
are crossings where the offset is smaller than there, and if the data and the
mapper are accurate, they do not put in a crossing at one point.
Original comment by robert.v...@gmx.de
on 10 Apr 2012 at 7:29
Ok, I can see your point. Should be relatively easy to fix by merging junctions
less than X meters apart. The only question is what would be the best distance
for this.
Since you seem to have looked at several examples, at what distance would you
determine it to be a real turn?
Original comment by veaac.fd...@gmail.com
on 11 Apr 2012 at 7:20
The distance depends on the width of the roads, but a single average value may
also work for most cases. I'd say 7 m.
Original comment by robert.v...@gmx.de
on 12 Apr 2012 at 6:48
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
robert.v...@gmx.de
on 7 Apr 2012 at 1:59