Is sending a pull request the only means of providing corrections/feedback?

rzach / forallx-yyc

UCalgary version of forallx, an introduction to formal logic

https://forallx.openlogicproject.org/

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

94 stars 30 forks source link

Is sending a pull request the only means of providing corrections/feedback? #65

Closed kedarmhaswade closed 1 year ago

kedarmhaswade commented 1 year ago

First off, thank you for making this available on GH. It just helps!

I couldn't find an instruction in the book preface or the GH repo about how to submit errata. Can that be clarified somewhere (preferably the preface)? If sending a PR is the way to go, please clarify it here and close the issue. I will send a PR.

rzach commented 1 year ago

PR is preferred but you can also file an issue with the requested change.

kedarmhaswade commented 1 year ago

If it is PR, I believe a separate PR is needed for every atomic change, right? I can send a PR.

But for something that is likely to be more contentious, perhaps an issue is better because then we can have a discussion, reach a consensus, and then a PR can be sent.