Closed TashiWalde closed 1 year ago
@TashiWalde this version seems to have a typechecking error (involving weakextext in the right orthogonal file).
@TashiWalde this version seems to have a typechecking error (involving weakextext in the right orthogonal file).
Yes, I'm fixing it.
@TashiWalde this version seems to have a typechecking error (involving weakextext in the right orthogonal file).
Fixed. The reason is that I am currently getting rid of instances of weakextext
and naiveextext
whenever I use them and always just replace them with extext
, in accordance to our new philosophy of taking extext
as the primary axiom.
great!
Note: I redefined
iso-eq
to have better definitional computational properties: Now the compositex = y -> Iso x y -> hom x y
is definitionally equal tohom-eq : x = y -> hom x y
.