Closed jonalfcam closed 1 year ago
Hi @jonalfcam. Your first term already exists and is called eq-is-contr.
I like leaving the new terms in the contractible types file in the new section. Just reference the existing definition of eq-is-contr
from the contractible types data section. Otherwise this looks ready to merge.
I added a proof that in contractible types paths can be identified. I also had two easy lemmas in the extension extensionality section