Closed emilyriehl closed 1 year ago
@fizruk @jonweinb could you review this when you get the chance?
@emilyriehl feel free to resolve the conversations above and merge.
Good suggestion @fizruk. I implemented that name change for the case of function types and also for the case of extension types. I just need approval again ;)
This pull request contains 700 lines of code to prove the two claimed equivalences on the final two lines of page 171 (and the dual statements). The first equivalence is an immediate application of
equiv-hom2-eq-comp-is-segal
. The second one, relating a composition equation between natural transformations to a composition equation between their components, was surprisingly delicate because one has to relate composition in a Segal function type with componentwise composition of natural transformations.It's possible this isn't optimal but I have tested that various proofs are not provable by
refl
.This is part of the way towards the proof of Theorem 11.8 but I'm not there yet!