Closed dvmcarpena closed 1 year ago
@dvmcarpena thanks for all this work. I'm going to hold off reviewing until I can get someone to look at the open adjunctions PR.
@dvmcarpena I did some renaming and changed the inputs to your function twice. Throught the library we often prove a logical equivalence iff
so I took that data as an input.
I'm going to merge this now to free up space for something else.
Closes #22 . Depends on some helper definitions in #55 , so it should not be merged before that one.
The PR also contains some basic results about propositions that I couldn't find in the library. Proof of 10.3 is split into three definitions: the map from natural isos to pointwise natural isos, the inverse map, and the proof of the equivalence. I am not sure of the names, please feel free to suggest better ones!