s0md3v / XSStrike

Most advanced XSS scanner.
GNU General Public License v3.0
13.16k stars 1.89k forks source link

Allow Injecting Payloads in URLs Path using requests or other light weight tool instead of selenium #406

Open basedygt opened 2 months ago

basedygt commented 2 months ago

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Injecting payloads in URLs paths is very slow as it uses selenium by default

Describe the solution you'd like Adding an additional argument which allows user to inject the payload with requests or other light weight tool should solve this issue

Additional context

For scanning a URL which reflects the value from it's path say https://example.com/file/payload results in file payload not found can be exploited with https://example.com/file/<script>alert(1)</script>

Using xsstrike we can automate it with below command:

python3 xsstrike.py -u "https://example.com/file/payload" --path

However it uses selenium to test payloads which is slow as compared to requests

TheRealH0u commented 1 week ago

I think they use Selenium because it's like using a real browser. Reqests only get the static page so no javascript execution. When using Selenium, if there is javascript being executed, you will get an alert box or an iframe. Reqests are quicker but how will you get the dynamic part of the page. If javascript alters the page in any way, like adding data from a AJAX request like your XSS, reqests won't wait for that it will only get the raw HTML that is loaded before the javascpit and potentially give a false negative. But thats just my theory of why they use Selenium and not requsts. Its also easier to get the HTML tags using the find_element_by_tag_name. In requsts the return is a string and to get the proper tag you would either have to use your own search engine which would be slow or inefficient or using an additional library like BeautifulSoup.