N-digit numbers in books (mysterious 33 & 07)

[elkolorado]

Repetitions

The file below lists all n-digit length numbers that repeat ATLEAST once. Meaning if the n-digit number exist atleast two times in all books, it is counted to the list.

The ~list 469-occ.csv shows the numbers from~ (edit: the file is uncorrect don't refer to it)

• 1-digit numbers

till

• 279-digit number

and their occurences. n for number o for times it occured in all 71 books.

Most of repetitions are created by the fact, that they are part of larger sequence that repeat, and you will notice those numbers (they will be basically smaller part of the larger string but shifted each time to left or right by one number) - yet the list includes all possibilities.

2-digit numbers repetitions

Graph below illustrates all 2-digit numbers that have atleast one repetition: the number 07 which not only doesn't repeat in books, but doesn't exist in them, making it the smallest number that doesn't exist in 469 books the number 33 however, exist only once in all books.

What makes those two numbers special more? They exist in other places related to 469.

The number 33

Secret libarary book:

One of newest books related to 469, contaning the number 33

Avar tar (3 times):

Avar tar had this number contained 3 times in his poem.

Tibia.org (2 times):

However the newest tibia.org poem that basically changes 63378129 to 62792068657272657261, making only 2 repetitions instead of 3, since the changed part removed the previous 33

The number 07

Also one of latest added 469 mentions in the game.

Conclusions

If any, please comment, but the biggest one is, that there is 33 number exisiting only once in books, and 07 that doesn't exist in books, and both of those numbers are pointed out in stuff that was released not so long ago.

Strange? What do you think?

[Sopel97]

The distribution of 2-digit subsequences (in the hellgate books) is indeed very skewed.

edit. All distributions of 2-digit subsequences in the hellgate books appears pretty well correlated, despite the low sample size in each book. Full correlation matrix here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BEaiDs1HjaCHElE1D4uEd5UIXLtD15Oq/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105721160237729588252&rtpof=true&sd=true (so it's unlikely that there are "wrong" books there. Only book 49 is suspicious 9521961800311457278572611857642197096805796366125275705845217652197278304648765159564611414519889975112161518005458561197353646724348561145196726114519031180657191894343)