sa-tre / satre-specification

Standard Architecture for Trusted Research Environments specification
https://satre-specification.readthedocs.io
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
18 stars 8 forks source link

Add UoD SATRE evaluation #297

Closed manics closed 1 year ago

manics commented 1 year ago

:white_check_mark: Checklist

:ballot_box_with_check: Maintainers' checklist

:arrow_heading_up: Summary

Adds the UoD SATRE evaluation

This adds the CSV (exported from the Excel file)- I can add the Excel if others think that's helpful, but I think it's better to avoid committing opaque binary blobs if possible. Maybe we should upload it to Zenodo.....?

To create the Markdown table I tried https://github.com/sphinx-contrib/datatemplates but it doesn't handle multi-line table cells so I had to fork it: https://github.com/sphinx-contrib/datatemplates/compare/master...sa-tre:sphinx-datatemplates:multiline-table-item?expand=1

I'd like to open a PR against upstream, but it'll need a test to be added which requires more time, so at the moment it's in my own GitHub account. If everyone's happy with this approach I'll transfer the repo to the sa-tre org, and hopefully contribute the fix upstream in future.

:closed_umbrella: Related issues

:raising_hand: Acknowledging contributors

manics commented 1 year ago

@sa-tre/spec-maintainers Could you let me know what you think of this approach? https://satre-specification--297.org.readthedocs.build/en/297/evaluations/dundee_hic.html The formatting isn't ideal, but I've spent enough time fighting with Sphinx and to improve things I think we may want to write our own plugin based on datatemplates. I still think it's better than just making the CSV available.

manics commented 1 year ago

I've added a link to TREEHOOSE though. It's a bit complicated though because our production TRE isn't yet using the current TREEHOOSE code base (it's using a much older forked version of https://github.com/awslabs/service-workbench-on-aws so they have the same root).

edwardchalstrey1 commented 1 year ago

I've added a link to TREEHOOSE though. It's a bit complicated though because our production TRE isn't yet using the current TREEHOOSE code base (it's using a much older forked version of https://github.com/awslabs/service-workbench-on-aws so they have the same root).

Ok good, maybe still worth having a brief explainer at the top on what Dundee HIC is, and that you have an AWS cloud-based TRE set up for research - see what I've written #298

JimMadge commented 1 year ago

The table from csv idea is great.

It feels like much less to ask for a csv than for people to do the evaluation, then type it up in Markdown!

manics commented 1 year ago

I think this is ready now!