Questionnaire summary: Decide process to handle free text (answers from a non-definable set)

[harisood]

 Handling free-text questions where answers come from a non-definable set

- 5.a Any other comments on network connectivity?
- 21. Additional technical features: describe other technical features we may have missed and how important they are. 
- 22. Additional comments: share any other thoughts and feelings on technical features.
- 24.a Additional aspects of governance: Briefly describe other aspects of governance we may have missed and how important they are.
- 25 Additional comments: share any other thoughts and feelings on policies and processes.

Notes

These will be a lot harder to categorise. Initial suggestions are to group responses by broad 'category', and 'subcategory', and treat them by percentage of responses (similar to #12)

[harisood]

Example - this is not actual analysis, but gives an example of how it could be done!

Additional technical features: describe other technical features we may have missed and how important they are.

Summary

Categorising responses to the free text question of features to include

Detail

Survey Results

Category	Subcategory	% Responses
Output checking	Statistical disclosure control	x %
Output checking	Admin approval of all egressed data	y %
Automation	User management	z%
...	...	...

Summary blurb, e.g.: There was a diverse set of additional technical features to consider shared by the community. Due to the lack of clear majority consensus on additional technical features to include, it is difficult to see how any of the above would be directly included in the specification, apart from feature X as referenced in category Y

Where

Specification features

Proposal

• Include feature X based on category Y in the 'Optional' features of a TRE specification
• Do not include any of the rest of the above in the specification