Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago could you enable all alerts (ses.set_alert_mask()) and print all the alerts you
get? This report does not contain enough information to pin point what's going
on. My first guess would be that the peers you get may be sending corrupt data
and they get banned.
have you tried other torrents?Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 22 Nov 2014 at 4:28
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago [deleted comment]@arvid as I mentioned, I tried 2 torrents which work wonderful with uT and
previous version of libtorrent.
What code should I add?Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 22 Nov 2014 at 6:59
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago --- temp.py 2014-11-22 01:12:00.000000000 -0800
+++ temp2.py 2014-11-22 01:30:39.000000000 -0800
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
ses = lt.session()
ses.listen_on(6881, 6891)
+ses.set_alert_mask(0xffffffff)
torrent_fname = ur"<censored>"
@@ -23,5 +24,9 @@
(s.progress * 100, s.download_rate / 1000, s.upload_rate / 1000,
s.num_peers, s.num_seeds, s.state )
+ alert_queue = ses.pop_alerts()
+ for a in alert_queue:
+ print(a.message())
+
time.sleep(1)
Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 22 Nov 2014 at 9:30
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago http://pastebin.com/tAVDwsrW
There is no ses.pop_alerts()
for a in iter(session.pop_alert, None):
print >>f, a.message()
Lets do it from the other side. Can you download any torrent with given
configuration?Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 22 Nov 2014 at 10:35
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago I don't have a windows machine easily accessible right now. Do you get any
alerts? any indications of what error you might have?
one guess would be that you use a forward-slash in your save-path on windows,
instead of backslash.Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 24 Nov 2014 at 9:38
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago See the link I gave. AFAIK windows is tolerant to slashes.
I think you have to get windows sooner or later if you want to fix this problem.Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 24 Nov 2014 at 10:32
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago > AFAIK windows is tolerant to slashes.
It is sometimes, but not in UNC paths. See
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365247%28v=vs.85%29.as
px#maxpath
specifically: "Note File I/O functions in the Windows API convert "/" to "\"
as part of converting the name to an NT-style name, except when using the
"\\?\" prefix as detailed in the following sections."Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 24 Nov 2014 at 7:25
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago Do you plan to fix it?Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 3 Dec 2014 at 10:27
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago Do you mean accepting unix paths on windows?
I'm not sure of a safe and reliable way to do that. On windows (ntfs at least)
a filename is allowed to contain a forward slash. Should libtorrent always
assume that a forward slash in the path is a directory separator?
did you confirm that this is what is causing the problem you're experiencing?Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 4 Dec 2014 at 1:35
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago No, I mean issue with 2.7 version not downloading. I have no glue why it's
happening. I uploaded the log, but it doesn't actually say much for my opinion.Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 5 Dec 2014 at 5:51
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago Could you post verbose logs from a test run that fails?Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 9 Dec 2014 at 3:18
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago Which test run? I don't know what you mean. Can you tell me how to produce them?Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 11 Dec 2014 at 5:13
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago the test run where you fail to download anything.
you get logs by building with: "b2 logging=verbose"Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 11 Dec 2014 at 8:22
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago I haven't compiled it, I downloaded a binary builds from links I provided. Why
don't you want to test it by yourself? I can give you a torrent link if you
cannot find one but every one should be fine.Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 12 Dec 2014 at 3:44
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago The torrents I test with work fine. sure, can you send me one that reproduces
the issue to arvid@libtorrent.org?Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 12 Dec 2014 at 3:50
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago [deleted comment]Here some filemon logs for 2.7 version:
1467 11:23:44 python.exe:3236 OPEN C:\path_to_program\.\dir_inside_torrent\file.
mdf PATH NOT FOUND Options: OpenIf Sequential Access: All
1468 11:23:44 python.exe:3236 OPEN C:\path_to_program\ SUCCESS Options: Open
Directory Access: All
1469 11:23:44 python.exe:3236 DIRECTORY C:\path_to_program\ SUCCESS FileBothDire
ctoryInformation: dir_inside_torrent
1470 11:23:44 python.exe:3236 CLOSE C:\path_to_program\ SUCCESS
1471 11:23:44 python.exe:3236 OPEN C:\path_to_program\.\dir_inside_torrent\file.
mdf PATH NOT FOUND Options: OpenIf Sequential Access: All
1472 11:23:44 python.exe:3236 OPEN C:\path_to_program\.\dir_inside_torrent\file.
mdf PATH NOT FOUND Options: Open Sequential Access: All
1473 11:23:44 python.exe:3236 OPEN C:\path_to_program\.\dir_inside_torrent\file.
mdf PATH NOT FOUND Options: OpenIf Sequential Access: All
1474 11:23:44 python.exe:3236 OPEN C:\path_to_program\ SUCCESS Options: Open
Directory Access: All
2.6 version doesn't try to open path with \.\ inside. Also, as you can see in
the start post, it prints "checking_resume_data" only once, regardless of
amount of data on disk while 2.6 version indeed rehashes files and that line is
printed many times. So the reason is probably the same as here
http://stackoverflow.com/a/6930555
But why is there no logs about failing to open path?
https://www.archlinux.org/releng/releases/2014.12.01/torrent/ here is the
example torrent.Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 17 Dec 2014 at 9:40
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago I believe this is fixed by [10620] in RC_1_0Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 18 Dec 2014 at 7:37
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago Yea, any windows binaries?
Are file access errors now properly logged?Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 18 Dec 2014 at 7:56
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago Why it's "fixed" if there is no windows binaries for that version?Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 19 Dec 2014 at 12:56
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago Would you please answer?Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 22 Dec 2014 at 2:31
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago it's "fixed" because the bug has been corrected in the head of all relevant
branches.Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 22 Dec 2014 at 3:52
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago The issue was named "Windows binaries for python 2.7 doesn't work". Can you
provide working binaries for python 2.7?Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 24 Dec 2014 at 1:24
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago What about time I spent reporting this issue and finding the reason?Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 24 Dec 2014 at 4:04
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago I sometimes release windows binaries for releases. I probably will for the next
release too. In the meantime you are welcome to check out the code from the
repository and build it yourself.Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 24 Dec 2014 at 6:51
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago Why haven't you marked those binaries as deprecated? Why haven't you told I'm
using outdated binaries?Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 24 Dec 2014 at 7:31
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago the files that are up as the default downloads on source forge are still the
latest releases. they're only "deprecated" once they are replaced by a newer
release.
if you consider any libtorrent based on an older version than head of the
branch "outdated", you're likely to use outdated binaries more or less all the
time. If you want to use the latest revision from svn, you'd need to build it
yourself and keep pulling it.Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 24 Dec 2014 at 8:18
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago The newest binaries version was 0.16.10 while there is already sources release
for 1.x. That's what I mean outdated. While you hidden Downloads, they are
still accessible from google.Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 25 Dec 2014 at 3:10
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago what do you mean by 0.16.10 being the newest binaries? 1.0.3 is the latest
stable and there are python binaries for windows. where do you see 0.16.10 as
the newest binaries?Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 25 Dec 2014 at 3:18
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago Here https://code.google.com/p/libtorrent/downloads/list
As I said, it's still available from google.
Where are latest python binaries? Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 26 Dec 2014 at 11:40
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago Do you mean this
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libtorrent/files/py-libtorrent/ ? For some
reason, google doesn't find them
https://www.google.com/search?q=libtorrent+1.0.3+windows
Then please either delete files from
https://code.google.com/p/libtorrent/downloads/list or mark them as deprecated
(when you try to delete a file google code asks you if you want to mark it as
deprecated instead). You should also take a look on this
https://www.google.com/search?q=libtorrent+python+download -
http://code.google.com/p/libtorrent/downloads/list is the first link for me.
Why haven't you told I'm using outdated verion? I've provided the download
links.Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 26 Dec 2014 at 11:58
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago I've removed the downloads tab on the google project when I switched back to
source forge. There's no way to navigate there. I suppose google keeps the
links around for archival purposes and to not invalidate links that may exist
to those files.
at libtorrent.org the python downloads point to source forge. Google search
should be able to down-rank the hits of the removed downloads, but I suppose it
doesn't.Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 26 Dec 2014 at 1:02
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago >I've removed the downloads tab on the google project when I switched back to
source forge. There's no way to navigate there.
But Google (and probably other search engines) doesn't care :) So would you
please mark all downloads as deprecated?
Is the link to google code downloads the first in google results because...
it's google?
Sorry, but this issue is not fixed. Python 2.7.5 (default, May 15 2013,
22:43:36) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)], Libtorrent 1.0.3.0 - same problem.Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 26 Dec 2014 at 1:29
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago Would you fix it please?Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 2 Jan 2015 at 4:27
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago [deleted comment]WOULD YOU OPEN THIS BUG??? IT'S NOT FIXED!!!!1Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 21 Feb 2015 at 4:49
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago I have the same problem. I am using Python version 2.66, 2.79 and libtorrent
version 0.16.5, 0.16.8, 0.16.16, 1.03 on windows with the same result as above.
But I can run it from Linux box using python 2.7.3 and 0.16.9. I think it is
something with the windows release. Please fix it.Original comment by umars...@gmail.com on 30 Mar 2015 at 10:34
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago I think I've solved the problem. I am using python 2.7.9 and libtorrent 1.0.3
on Windows 8.1 64 bit. The solution is written in
http://stackoverflow.com/a/6930555 as noted above.
Using the source code at the top, what I did was just changing from
'save_path': './',
to
'save_path': '.\\',
and it worked. I think the sample code at
http://www.libtorrent.org/python_binding.html should be edited to use portable
function such as os.getcwd() to avoid wasting time debugging.Original comment by umars...@gmail.com on 31 Mar 2015 at 3:30
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago Thanks. I will update the example.Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 31 Mar 2015 at 10:16
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago umars...@gmail.com
Why does it happen? Windows allows / as path separator.Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 2 May 2015 at 11:51
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago not if you use UNC paths. i.e. prefix it with "\\.\", which is also the only
way to support long filenames/paths, and to support historically reserved words
like "con", "prn" etc.Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 3 May 2015 at 12:58
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago >which is also the only way to support long filenames/paths
Wut?
How does cmd support long file names? It accepts / as separator too.
Why do you want to create files with reserved names? They won't be accessible
from most programs.Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 3 May 2015 at 2:40
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago "long names" means 32000 characters. it's not libtorrent that decides the
filenames, the .torrent file creators do. A .torrent file with a reserved name
would otherwise hang the client (because it would try to access a device that
doesn't exist, or doesn't behave like a file)Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 3 May 2015 at 10:30
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago And now will it just create a file that wouldn't be accessible from other
programs?
Can you provide the code that doesn't accept / ?Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 9 May 2015 at 12:29
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago other (windows) programs have access to the same API libtorrent does. of course
other programs can access files too.
what do you mean by "providing the code"?
When specifying paths in the UNC form on windows, *windows* does not accept
forward slashes as directory separators. I don't have the windows source code,
but that would be the code not accepting it.
You can read more about UNC paths here:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg465305.aspxOriginal comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 9 May 2015 at 1:21
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago I mean the code in your lib that fails opening.Original comment by xpeh.o...@googlemail.com on 11 May 2015 at 1:01
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
8 years ago most (all I believe) of disk I/O abstracted by src/file.cpp, providing a
platform independent interface.Original comment by arvid.no...@gmail.com on 11 May 2015 at 6:09
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
xpeh.o...@googlemail.comon 22 Nov 2014 at 3:11