saa-ts-dacs dacs issues

saa-ts-dacs / dacs

Describing Archives: A Content Standard

73 stars 32 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

DACS should provide guidance on making descriptive language accessible

#96 alisonclemens opened 5 months ago
0
Update 01_conditions_governing_access.md

#95 regineheberlein opened 6 months ago
0
Instructions are needed regarding containers information and/or links in order to abide by the "for use" principle

#94 KateBowersHarvard2 opened 7 months ago
11
What activities does Principle 6 require to be documented?

#93 regineheberlein opened 7 months ago
3
Should DACS make a distinction between processing note and revision note?

#92 regineheberlein closed 1 month ago
4
Clarification / pointing toward authority records in 2.7 exclusions

#91 mfeustle opened 10 months ago
0
Update 02_chapter_09.md

#90 mfeustle closed 1 month ago
0
Update 03_appendix_c_crosswalks.md

#89 regineheberlein closed 1 month ago
0
Use of "Levels of Description" between Chapter 1 and Chapter 9

#88 mfeustle closed 1 month ago
0
Fixes footnote link

#87 gwiedeman closed 1 year ago
0
Fix chart link

#86 gwiedeman closed 1 year ago
0
Update 02_historical_summary.md

#85 kbogan opened 1 year ago
1
Update 07_administrative_biographical_history.md

#84 kbogan opened 1 year ago
2
Update 01_scope_and_content.md

#83 regineheberlein closed 1 month ago
1
Arrangement note changes

#81 gwiedeman opened 1 year ago
0
New example in 3.1.5

#80 mfeustle closed 1 year ago
1
DACS for Spanish-language finding aids

#79 mfeustle opened 2 years ago
2
Rda crosswalks

#78 katyrawdon closed 2 years ago
1
Look to outside resources/examples for improvements to DACS

#77 DonnellyW opened 2 years ago
1
does Principle 11 require a new section in DACS?

#76 regineheberlein opened 2 years ago
0
should version control be required?

#75 regineheberlein opened 2 years ago
0
Include guidance on which parts of the description should be updated and which should persist

#74 regineheberlein opened 2 years ago
4
Define minimum required element set for description of each iteration (revision)

#73 regineheberlein opened 2 years ago
2
Define minimum required element set for baseline description

#72 regineheberlein opened 2 years ago
2
Document the creators of the description, including revisions

#71 regineheberlein opened 2 years ago
0
Revision notes should be required

#70 regineheberlein opened 2 years ago
3
Processing note should be a single level required or optimum

#69 kbogan opened 2 years ago
8
3.1.5 Unfamiliar terminology

#68 kbogan closed 1 year ago
2
Review all existing examples in DACS

#67 kbogan opened 2 years ago
0
In general, DACS should reflect a more active voice

#66 kbogan closed 2 years ago
1
Recommend reviewing and possibly revising the current “Introduction to Describing Archival Materials”

#65 DonnellyW opened 2 years ago
0
In general DACS should include language affirming inclusive and thoughtful description

#64 sreller opened 2 years ago
3
Include information about considering a plurality of users when assigning access points.

#63 sreller opened 2 years ago
1
Additional Statement of Principles and Level of Description in Chapter 9 on Authority Records

#62 sreller opened 2 years ago
1
In Levels of Description include a recommendation for prioritizing minimal processing

#61 sreller opened 2 years ago
1
Update Scope and Content Note examples replacing outdated terminology

#60 sreller closed 1 month ago
0
Recommend bioghist notes do not include aggrandizing language

#59 faithc opened 2 years ago
1
Recommend scopecontent notes that emphasize subject matter and context over content/format

#58 faithc opened 2 years ago
0
Recommend increased use of archival authorities beyond the main creator(s)

#57 faithc opened 2 years ago
2
In general, DACS should encourage/require archivists to be more transparent in archival description

#56 matthewgorham opened 2 years ago
0
In practice, DACS does not really treat archival description as a continuous intellectual endeavor

#55 matthewgorham opened 2 years ago
2
Current Introductions may not be very useful or effective

#54 gwiedeman opened 2 years ago
0
Should DACS promote structured dates more?

#53 gwiedeman opened 2 years ago
1
5.4 "Informal" accruals

#52 mfeustle opened 2 years ago
0
Tension in scope between DACS 2.7 and DACS Part II

#51 mfeustle opened 2 years ago
2
2.7.11 Tone and style of bio/historical notes

#50 mfeustle opened 2 years ago
1
DACS should encourage user-friendly extent descriptions

#49 gwiedeman opened 2 years ago
1
Poor examples in 3.2 System of Arrangement note

#48 gwiedeman opened 2 years ago
0
Update 3_variant_forms_of_names.md

#47 milesnimer closed 2 years ago
0
Chapter 6: scope, content, order of topics

#46 mfeustle opened 2 years ago
0