Add new curves in "Types of Streams"

[PaulRBerg]

We've introduced four new curves in the UI, but we haven't updated the Types of Streams page to include them.

• Monthly Unlocks
• Timelock
• Unlock-Linear
• Unlock-Cliff

[andreivladbrg]

Isn't the current unlock-in-steps pretty much the same with "Monthly Unlocks"? @PaulRBerg

[PaulRBerg]

@andreivladbrg kind of but not really.

1. MU should contain month names on the X axis.
2. UiS can do more than MU, so we should update UiS to highlight this extra flexibility. For instance, days or weeks.

[andreivladbrg]

kind of but not really

IMO, MU is just a subset of UiS

currently, the FunctionPlot component displays "time" on the X axis, not specifying the unit (days/weeks/months)

which do you think is better (or other suggestions):

• change the component or add another that specifically labels the X axis as "months"
• keep the component as is but add comments under "Monthly Unlocks" explaining that the numbers on the time axis represent months

[PaulRBerg]

MU is just a subset of UiS

Yes, which means that they are not the same thing.

FunctionPlot component displays "time" on the X axis

So is it not possible to display something else?

change the component or add another that specifically labels the X axis as "months"

This

[andreivladbrg]

yes, they are not the same thing, but since $MU ⊆ UiS$ why not include some comments about MU at the UiS shape, can't we do this?

So is it not possible to display something else?

yes it is possible, but it requires to change the current function or to implement a new one

https://github.com/sablier-labs/docs/blob/11600fadf63bf895efd5872b9bca3d3a3ffc21e6/src/components/FunctionPlot.tsx#L18

[PaulRBerg]

why not include some comments about MU at the UiS shape, can't we do this?

The masses like concrete examples. They do not think mathematically.

The documentation site is meant to dumb down Sablier.

it requires to change the current function or to implement a new one

Let's do it

[andreivladbrg]

The masses like concrete examples. They do not think mathematically documentation site is meant to dumb down Sablier

i agree that the masses like concrete examples, and that's why we include them at the interface level.

however, my understanding was that the documentation site is intended for developers, who are presumably technical. if that's not the case (if it's not specifically for developers) then i agree

[PaulRBerg]

developers like concrete examples, too

[andreivladbrg]

so, you're saying that keeping UiS, along with comments on how this method can achieve monthly unlocks, does not represent a concrete example for developers - fair enough

how should the curve look like? same number of unlocks as UiS, or less/multiple?

[PaulRBerg]

Yes

how should the curve look like? same number of unlocks as UiS, or less/multiple?

I answered this in a comment above. We should make it different (fewer, more, it doesn't matter) so that they are visually differentiable

[smol-ninja]

After V2.2, wouldn't we use Lockup Tranched to create unlock-in-steps and unlock-each-month streams in the UI? If yes, then why are we including them to Lockup dynamic section in doc?

[andreivladbrg]

You are right Shub, thanks for pointing out. These shapes will be placed under Lockup Tranched section after v2.2 docs update.