Refactor "normalized" to "scaled" and "denormalize" to "raw"

[PaulRBerg]

I've swung back and forth between 'normalized' and 'scaled' for a while.

Now, I am in favor of refactoring normalized to scaled, and denormalized to raw because it's shorter, and I think it's a better fit for purpose.

The following change list applies to the terminology implemented in #205:

• [ ] Rename normalized prefix to scaled
  • Thankfully, there's no corresponding raw prefix to refactor because all non-prefixed amounts are assumed to be raw anyway, e.g. refundAmount
• [ ] Rename Helpers.denormalizeAmount to getRawAmount
• [ ] Rename Helpers.normalizeAmount to getScaledAmount
• [ ] Refactor all tests to conform to this new terminology

Alternatively, we could say descaled instead of raw, and descaleAmount instead of getRawAmount.

LMK what you think @sablier-labs/solidity.

[andreivladbrg]

As a personal heuristic, I always try to use short names when naming variables. However, in this case, I think “normalize” and “denormalize” are more precise than “scaled” and “raw,” tho I still like the latter two.

So, for me, both options work, and you can decide which one to use.

[smol-ninja]

We can close this issue as well.

[PaulRBerg]

Savage.