Closed smol-ninja closed 1 month ago
Yeah go ahead @PaulRBerg
Thanks, good to merge now.
We might want to add the same assumption about the admin in the Lockup security document.
Thank you.
Yes there is a separate issue to track that: https://github.com/sablier-labs/v2-core/issues/1065.
Update protocol assumption post Cantina finding. Also added assumption about tokens with admin powers as pointed by @razgraf on Slack.
Closes https://github.com/sablier-labs/flow/issues/310.
@andreivladbrg I have replaced the "delay" keyword with "precision errors" and "loss" as thats what Cantina auditors used in their submissions. I think these terms are easier to follow compared to "delay" keywords.