How to reproduce the problem: run EMPP on https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/Q9NZC2/entry and zoom in the residue feature viewer into region of residues ~100-150.
This shows two problems:
box size seems not to align with the range that is given in the box. In the attached example the green "small molecule" box says "110-114" but this does not align with the number of residues shown in the upper most lane (example_1.png). The same holds true for secondary structure boxes. It seems like boxes are not properly re-scaled after zooming in.
On the same note/same_protein: once hovering over the predicted metal site (example_2.png), it also says residue 114 (so it should overlap with the small_molecule box mentioned in the previous bullet point), however, it does not overlap/align, despite covering the same residue (114).
Also weird: Metal-binding (blue boxes in both attached examples) is at one point shown in the upper lane, once in the lower lane. I understand that this is probably due to overlap of the second metal-binding prediction with small-mol prediction but I would argue that it is more intuitive if one feature is always shown in the same lane (but this is rather minor as I assume that this has a technical reason and is hard to fix)
How to reproduce the problem: run EMPP on https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/Q9NZC2/entry and zoom in the residue feature viewer into region of residues ~100-150. This shows two problems:
box size seems not to align with the range that is given in the box. In the attached example the green "small molecule" box says "110-114" but this does not align with the number of residues shown in the upper most lane (example_1.png). The same holds true for secondary structure boxes. It seems like boxes are not properly re-scaled after zooming in.
On the same note/same_protein: once hovering over the predicted metal site (example_2.png), it also says residue 114 (so it should overlap with the small_molecule box mentioned in the previous bullet point), however, it does not overlap/align, despite covering the same residue (114).
Also weird: Metal-binding (blue boxes in both attached examples) is at one point shown in the upper lane, once in the lower lane. I understand that this is probably due to overlap of the second metal-binding prediction with small-mol prediction but I would argue that it is more intuitive if one feature is always shown in the same lane (but this is rather minor as I assume that this has a technical reason and is hard to fix)