Definitions in the terminology draft are already based on each other, e.g. multiple definitions are based on/referring to the term Endpoint. Taking this a small step further, consistent cross-referencing of related definition could increase the comprehensibility of the terminology draft, but could also have an impact on readability.
Are there good reasons speaking against following this approach more thoroughly throughout the terminology draft?
Definitions in the terminology draft are already based on each other, e.g. multiple definitions are based on/referring to the term Endpoint. Taking this a small step further, consistent cross-referencing of related definition could increase the comprehensibility of the terminology draft, but could also have an impact on readability.
Are there good reasons speaking against following this approach more thoroughly throughout the terminology draft?