sacmwg / draft-ietf-sacm-terminology

SACM terminology aligned with best practice definitions, standard references, and terminology definitions of other work groups
Other
2 stars 2 forks source link

Propose to remove Target Endpoint Characterization #74

Closed adammontville closed 6 years ago

adammontville commented 6 years ago

We have already talked about "Endpoint Characterization" and "Target Endpoint" is it really necessary to define the combination of the two? Or, does this jive with that?

henkbirkholz commented 6 years ago

This is an oversight. The term "Endpoint Characterization" is always about target endpoints and should be renamed to "Target Endpoint Characterization".

adammontville commented 6 years ago

Ok, then the definition would be changed to The description of the distinctive nature of a target endpoint, that is based on its characteristics from The description of the distinctive nature of an endpoint, that is based on its characteristics.

adammontville commented 6 years ago

Addressed in branch no-label-issues (to be sync'd soon)

henkbirkholz commented 6 years ago

Only Target Endpoints have to be classified, not every endpoint.

Edit: Sorry, I meant Characterization, but it is true for both.

henkbirkholz commented 6 years ago

In general Classification and Characterization is only required for Target Endpoints. Labels can be used for every endpoint, including SACM Components. Does that clarify the issue a bit?

I.e. my proposal is roughly this: keep terms including "Target" wrt Classification and Characterization & keep the three terms Endpoint Label, Target Endpoint Label and SACM Component Label.