Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
[deleted comment]
For context, the bug is explained in
http://groups.google.com/group/testability-explorer/msg/3700c79eb721b341
Original comment by pja...@gmail.com
on 23 Apr 2009 at 5:34
I'm going to take a look into this one. Thanks Peter.
Original comment by christia...@gmail.com
on 23 Apr 2009 at 6:56
So I ran it on israfil-micro-container, hosted at israfil-micro.googlecode.com,
and it worked when I ran the TE
report as the only maven report. I'm going to start adding different reports
around it and seeing if it's affected
by them. I'm wondering if something isn't being cleaned-up that we can find
that's maybe wrecking the stream.
Original comment by christia...@gmail.com
on 24 Apr 2009 at 6:07
yeah - even one other report plugin mangles the image. The earlier runs I did
also had no analysis underneath,
but I can't tell if that was an anomaly. At least it's clear there's some
interaction between reporting plugins that's
not healthy.
Original comment by christia...@gmail.com
on 24 Apr 2009 at 6:30
Original comment by aeagle22206
on 8 Jul 2009 at 5:26
Good ping, alex. I'll put this back on my priority list.
Original comment by christia...@gmail.com
on 8 Jul 2009 at 5:38
Any new news on this issue?
Original comment by gpampara@gmail.com
on 16 Sep 2009 at 5:17
Any news on this issue?
Original comment by gauravsw...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2009 at 8:44
Gak. This is still on my list, but I haven't had any time to work on it. I'm
going to try to
do a bit more investigation this coming week over the holiday.
Original comment by christia...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2009 at 4:44
A trivial approach would be to define this as an external report, i.e. one that
isn't
skinned. I've attached a patch that does so; it's more of a workaround than a
fix,
but at least the report is complete and usable.
I've actually been trying to get the skinned version working, and have a
relatively
minimal IT that fails on a symptom of the corruption (two </html> tags in the
output
file), but I'm having some trouble reusing the existing HTML report. I think a
fix
is going to mean a Maven-specific report generator, which probably belongs in
the
plugin rather than in the core.
Original comment by pja...@gmail.com
on 27 Nov 2009 at 6:41
Attachments:
What I am seeing is a page with the Maven skin/normal decorations but the TE
data is
all plain text. Is that what this issue is about (is that what borked means?
;-))?
(I'm wondering if there is some other setup needed on my part, e.g. CSS files or
something to make it work; but I don't think so based on my quick review)
What a bummer - really looking forward to adding this to our site gen! :-(
Original comment by jeffjjen...@gmail.com
on 24 Feb 2010 at 9:11
any updates on this? Problem is still there on current version: the html output
is
appended after the </html> of the normal maven-site.
Is there a workaround?
thanks,
dominik
Original comment by dominik....@gmail.com
on 5 May 2010 at 10:35
I've revised my patch to more fully implement the external report, as simply
returning true from isExternalReport() doesn't appear to be sufficient.
This does appear to fix the original problem of corrupt HTML pages, so perhaps
it's
worth adding a new defect to implement a skinnable version of the report?
Original comment by pja...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2010 at 4:11
Attachments:
Sounds great... I think it is better to have the report/data and no skinning
than no
report - I'm not worried about skinning! Can a committer approve/commit this
patch
and release so we can use it?
Original comment by jeffjjen...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2010 at 6:09
I've tested this patch and appears to solve the problem. But it seems this
issue has been forgotten. It would be *really* nice if a commiter could apprve
this patch!
Original comment by otavioma...@gmail.com
on 1 Oct 2011 at 2:21
I'll take a look at the patch tomorrow. Sorry - this had completely fallen off
my radar screen.
Original comment by christia...@gmail.com
on 5 Oct 2011 at 2:23
Would definitely love this to be fixed.
Original comment by benha...@gmail.com
on 17 Sep 2012 at 5:34
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
aeagle22206
on 13 Apr 2009 at 11:11