All of the safe address send ETH To same receiver 0x69af5d305e27a4bc55c81cd8e91faf23eb0eaa77 at same time period 2021/09/01, check table π¨π¨π¨π¨
All of the safe address send ETH To same receiver 0x69af5d305e27a4bc55c81cd8e91faf23eb0eaa77 at same time Amount < 0.001 ETH, check table π¨π¨π¨π¨
Please Check Table ππ»
Address -- multi-sign safe address
Execute transactions -- The number of execute transactions by multi-sign address
Addresses are reported by retrieving information from the chain, using bitquery's graphql, and detecting abnormal behavior, such as empty wallets, mutual transfers, etc.
When only some of the anomalous behaviors are present, we can consider the address reasonable, but when an address has all the anomalous behaviors, we have good reason to suspect that the address is false. Especially if the multi-signature address and the owner address have obvious exceptions both, then it is obvious that this is airdrop farmer.
Abnormal behaviors include
For Multi-Sign Address
Few transactions were executed
There is a lot of overlap in the interactions, such as the destination address, and the time
The owner of multiple multi-signature addresses is exactly the same, and never changes from start to finish
For Owner Address
Empty address
The first source of funds is the owner.
Mutual transfer
Behavior similarity
If the verification is passed and my strategy is great, I can provide my source code, but for now it is not conveninet
Related Safe Addresses
Reasoning
All of The Owner first Money From same wallet
All of The Owner receiver Money at same time period
Group Owner is always same, no add and no remove
0x69af5d305e27a4bc55c81cd8e91faf23eb0eaa77
-- send 127 transactions, Main Wallet, Distribute ETH0x2913fa494dcc3fa67620ef1a02b5e230d0f86d04
-- send 2 transactions, First Money π°0.025ETHπ° Came From Main Wallet. Apr-17-2021 04:45:21 PM +UTC. https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa917efa56eb29122ad973b9e1f7830128a07e9378e5ad3d17d809e89f27f338f0x60989874a480177a1e7f5d53506173d3d81809e7
-- send 46 transactions, First Money π°0.025ETHπ° Came From Main Wallet. Apr-17-2021 04:46:56 PM +UTC https://etherscan.io/tx/0x6a8e90516a8be0d1a88799cdf328c27d6df814b14124f22e1abdb7876900830d0x9eee320352d06e06250f04d5d55b42e58169d58d
-- send 103 transactions, First Money π°0.025ETHπ° Came From Main Wallet. Apr-17-2021 04:46:56 PM +UTC https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa08311b4b8dc8e4b5c11abfd88e223cc143d1ee0abb076e97d3da0175c76dcb7All of the safe address send ETH To same receiver
0x69af5d305e27a4bc55c81cd8e91faf23eb0eaa77
at same time period2021/09/01
, check table π¨π¨π¨π¨All of the safe address send ETH To same receiver
0x69af5d305e27a4bc55c81cd8e91faf23eb0eaa77
at same time Amount < 0.001 ETH, check table π¨π¨π¨π¨Please Check Table ππ»
Methodology
Addresses are reported by retrieving information from the chain, using bitquery's graphql, and detecting abnormal behavior, such as empty wallets, mutual transfers, etc.
When only some of the anomalous behaviors are present, we can consider the address reasonable, but when an address has all the anomalous behaviors, we have good reason to suspect that the address is false. Especially if the multi-signature address and the owner address have obvious exceptions both, then it is obvious that this is airdrop farmer.
Abnormal behaviors include
For Multi-Sign Address
For Owner Address
If the verification is passed and my strategy is great, I can provide my source code, but for now it is not conveninet
Safe Address
0xce495858e36c95f491b5a32ca2664405cf10ab76
Thanks