wjw12
commented
2 years ago Hi team, please review the timeline summarized by @memebeat https://github.com/safe-global/safe-user-allocation-reports/issues/221#issuecomment-1250022810 and the timeline summarized by me https://github.com/safe-global/safe-user-allocation-reports/issues/221#issuecomment-1250113842. We used different methods and found some overlapping addresses at different times.
I believe @airdrop-killer submitted some addresses in the 6th version of #108 before memebeat (author of #197, #221) and me (author of #214 #215). Hope you could bring the timestamps and contents under your scrutiny to give a fair judgement. Thanks!
tschubotz
airdrop-killer
At First, The reason for the multiple edits in the first place was that I was using github for the first time，So I don't know the roles. But even if I edit many times, it can only be judged as suspected plagiarism, rather than has been plagiarized. The following is my proof that I did not plagiarize： First of all, #108 is valid Because you have accepted the report #221 , and the author of #221 also acknowledge there has 290 addresses earlier than #221
This is the timeline reorganized by memebeat.
https://github.com/safe-global/safe-user-allocation-reports/issues/221#issuecomment-1250022810
And then the 666 addresses listed in #298 are identical to #108 , even in the same order, according to the timeline #108 predates #298 , as shown in the graphic evidence
And, if I did plagiarize, how did I plagiarize to an address that no one else had submitted ?
By the way if u look at the Form I submitted, you'll see that I found these addresses in other ways ，It's different from other guys.
https://airtable.com/shrttPfyBh07QFVnU/tbltcklWQn3qTLBAE
@tschubotz