safing / portmaster-packaging

Portmaster packages and installers
GNU General Public License v3.0
49 stars 22 forks source link

cannot install portmaster-1.0.0~2-1.x86_64 as there are no installation for ARM #101

Closed vladimirtravalja closed 5 months ago

vladimirtravalja commented 8 months ago

What would you like to add or change?:

installing package portmaster via dnf failed due to architecture incompatibility. Actually the error is OK as I am running ARM instead of x86_64, so it would be great if this can be recompiled for aarm64 as well.

Why do you and others need this?:

Well, we would like to have possibility to run it on "aarm64" architecture. We know that majority of machines are x86_64 but since people are more and more moving to low power CPUs like ARM, it would be great if this can be compiled for this architecture as well.

Thnx

Raphty commented 8 months ago

ARM is something we are going to tackle in the future, but no timeline as of yet.

Thanks for the suggestion, it helps us to understand when the demand for new features is growing so we can prioritize accordingly.

vladimirtravalja commented 8 months ago

Raphty, thank you for reply. More and more people are transitioning to ARM arch, from Linux perspective but also on the Mac and now on Windows as well (with the new ARM Snapdragon coming to play), so recompiling this to provide arm64 support would indeed make sense.

Thank you once again and have a lovely day.

dhaavi commented 8 months ago

While we do not yet have packages for arm, our script installer should work with arm: https://wiki.safing.io/en/Portmaster/Install/Linux

vladimirtravalja commented 8 months ago

While we do not yet have packages for arm, our script installer should work with arm: https://wiki.safing.io/en/Portmaster/Install/Linux

Screenshot 2023-12-01 at 09 33 08

This is from Fedora 39 aarm64 using script which you pointed out. Unsupported architecture aarch64.

Unfortunately it does not work Brgds

github-actions[bot] commented 5 months ago

This issue has been automatically marked as inactive because it has not had activity in the past two months.

If no further activity occurs, this issue will be automatically closed in one week in order to increase our focus on active topics.

github-actions[bot] commented 5 months ago

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had recent activity. Thank you for your contributions.

If the issue has not been resolved, you can find more information in our Wiki or continue the conversation on our Discord.