Closed williamstein closed 10 years ago
Dependencies: #15245
This needs to be rebased to #15245.
rebased after #15245
Description changed:
---
+++
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
The aim of this ticket is to propose a new interface with OEIS http://oeis.org/
Apply:
-* [attachment: trac_10358-oeis-tm.patch](https://github.com/sagemath/sage-prod/files/10651534/trac_10358-oeis-tm.patch.gz)
+* [attachment: trac_10358-oeis-tm_rebase.patch](https://github.com/sagemath/sage-prod/files/10651539/trac_10358-oeis-tm_rebase.patch.gz)
* [attachment: trac_10358-oeis-review_1-tm.patch](https://github.com/sagemath/sage-prod/files/10651535/trac_10358-oeis-review_1-tm.patch.gz)
* [attachment: trac_10358-oeis-review_2-tm.patch](https://github.com/sagemath/sage-prod/files/10651536/trac_10358-oeis-review_2-tm.patch.gz)
* [attachment: trac_10358-oeis-review_3-nc-tm.patch](https://github.com/sagemath/sage/files/ticket10358/67d8b96f8e3df0fd19199ab7e76eeaa4.gz)
Attachment: trac_10358-oeis-tm_rebase.patch.gz
The rebase is a shift in sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx
apply trac_10358-oeis-tm_rebase.patch trac_10358-oeis-review_1-tm.patch trac_10358-oeis-review_2-tm.patch trac_10358-oeis-review_3-nc-tm.patch
The patches apply now.
Merged: sage-5.13.beta2
Joy, joy, joy is all around us!
Hail to Thierry, Hail to Nathann!
I use this closed ticket to touch the interested people. In March 2017 I got:
sage: oeis([1,1,2,5,14])
0: A000108: Catalan numbers: C(n) = binomial(2n,n)/(n+1) = (2n)!/(n!(n+1)!). \
Also called Segner numbers.
1: A120588: G.f. satisfies: 3*A(x) = 2 + x + A(x)^2, with a(0) = 1.
2: A080937: Number of Catalan paths (nonnegative, starting and ending at 0, s\
tep +/-1) of 2*n steps with all values <= 5.
and now I get with Sage 8.3:
sage: oeis([1,1,2,5,14])
0: A000108: Catalan numbers: C(n) = binomial(2n,n)/(n+1) = (2n)!/(n!(n+1)!). Also called Segner numbers.
1: A120588: G.f. satisfies: 3*A(x) = 2 + x + A(x)^2, with a(0) = 1.
2: A000679: Number of groups of order 2^n.
I have two questions:
1) why did the output change?
2) why do we get only 3 answers (I checked with len(oeis(...))
that there are only 3 answers, and it is not only 3 answers that are printed), whereas the OEIS official site gives 209 answers?
Replying to @zimmermann6:
I use this closed ticket to touch the interested people. In March 2017 I got:
sage: oeis([1,1,2,5,14]) 0: A000108: Catalan numbers: C(n) = binomial(2n,n)/(n+1) = (2n)!/(n!(n+1)!). \ Also called Segner numbers. 1: A120588: G.f. satisfies: 3*A(x) = 2 + x + A(x)^2, with a(0) = 1. 2: A080937: Number of Catalan paths (nonnegative, starting and ending at 0, s\ tep +/-1) of 2*n steps with all values <= 5.
and now I get with Sage 8.3:
sage: oeis([1,1,2,5,14]) 0: A000108: Catalan numbers: C(n) = binomial(2n,n)/(n+1) = (2n)!/(n!(n+1)!). Also called Segner numbers. 1: A120588: G.f. satisfies: 3*A(x) = 2 + x + A(x)^2, with a(0) = 1. 2: A000679: Number of groups of order 2^n.
I have two questions:
1) why did the output change?
The oeis
module connects to an on-line database, which is subject to changes. The output depends on the ordering provided by OEIS, which depends on various criteria (i do not know the details, but if the sequence has keywords interesting
or important
it will appear earlier).
2) why do we get only 3 answers (I checked with
len(oeis(...))
that there are only 3 answers, and it is not only 3 answers that are printed), whereas the OEIS official site gives 209 answers?
You can get help about oeis
as follows:
sage: oeis?
You can see that there is a max_results
option, which is set by default to 3 to avoid the outout being flooded. Maybe this could be extended to, say, 10.
Also, OEIS will only send the 100 first results even if you do:
sage: oeis([1,1,2,5,14], max_results=2000)
This is why there is a first_result
option, to be able to access the next ones.
Thierry, thank you for your answer.
Of course I had tried oeis?
, and in Sage 8.3 I get:
* "max_results" - (integer, default: 30) the maximum number of
results to return, they are sorted according to their relevance.
In any cases, the OEIS website will never provide more than 100
results.
thus the documentation seems to differ from the code. Should I open a new ticket for that?
The sloane_find command, which parses output of a webpage, is broken for years due to the Sloane sequence webpage being rewritten. It silently always finds nothing.
The aim of this ticket is to propose a new interface with OEIS http://oeis.org/
Apply:
Depends on #15245
CC: @sagetrac-sage-combinat @williamstein @kini @jpflori @sagetrac-chrisjamesberg @VivianePons
Component: combinatorics
Keywords: Cernay2012 days49
Author: Thierry Monteil
Reviewer: Nathann Cohen
Merged: sage-5.13.beta2
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10358