Representations and latex representations of uniformizers

sagemath / sage

Main repository of SageMath

https://www.sagemath.org

Other

1.36k stars 462 forks source link

Representations and latex representations of uniformizers #14829

Open xcaruso opened 11 years ago

xcaruso commented 11 years ago

This small package provides the functions uniformizer_name and latex_uniformizer_name that returns a "pretty" string/latex representation of the uniformizer of a discrete valuation ring/field (either a padic ring/field or a ring of Laurent series or a field of power series).

These functions can be useful because, in the padic world, a uniformizer prints itself together with some O(...).

Component: padics

Keywords: printing uniformizer

Author: Xavier Caruso

Branch/Commit: u/rws/representations_and_latex_representations_of_uniformizers @ fe48736

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14829

roed314 commented 11 years ago

comment:2

You used tab characters in this patch, which Python complains about
You should add a commit message (by doing sage -hg qrefresh -e and editing the commit message before exporting the patch).

xcaruso commented 11 years ago

Attachment: trac_14829_repr_uniformizer.patch.gz

xcaruso commented 11 years ago

comment:3

Fixed. (And sorry for the delay, I forgot this...)

rwst commented 10 years ago

Branch: u/rws/representations_and_latex_representations_of_uniformizers

7ed8c4ca-6d56-4ae9-953a-41e42b4ed313 commented 10 years ago

Commit: fe48736

7ed8c4ca-6d56-4ae9-953a-41e42b4ed313 commented 10 years ago

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

fe48736 Merge branch 'develop' into t/14829/representations_and_latex_representations_of_uniformizers

jdemeyer commented 10 years ago

comment:9

I don't understand which problem this patch is trying to solve and why you give errors when the base ring is not a field...