Closed rwst closed 10 years ago
Branch: u/rws/ticket/15812
New commits:
b3544d7 | trac 15812: fix omissions of articles, wording, and typos |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
f6cef26 | Merge branch 'develop' into ticket/15812 |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
ec74e60 | Merge branch 'develop' into ticket/15812 |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
c46ad14 | Merge branch 'develop' (6.2.beta4) into ticket/15812 |
Most of this seems fine. Keep in mind that the initial work was done by a native Slavic-language speaker, if I recall correctly, so perhaps lacking articles is not a surprise. Also, I don't have an opinion on whether we need periods for the option list. I do have one question:
In most cases returns SymbolicEquation
So, is the output block saying what the function does (so, needs "returns") or giving a command (so, needs "return")? Or perhaps some third option (like "returns a")? I usually like the first option, but I don't recall if there is a policy.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
7ab44db | adhere to return/returns doc convention |
There is indeed a convention, and it argues against the "returns" form: http://sagemath.org/doc/developer/coding_basics.html#docstring-markup-with-rest-and-sphinx
The commit adapts the text to it, finally. Thanks for the hint.
Ah, I thought maybe that had been clarified recently. Glad I wasn't dreaming it.
Another thing found in a few places:
Initials conditions are optional.
Maybe "initial"?
And:
Higher ordered,
Probably is "higher order".
Do you want "laplace" capitalized?
And:
Higher ordered,
Probably is "higher order".
I want to give this positive review, but this isn't fixed. Idiomatic (English) for diffeqs is "higher order", not "higher ordered", whether or not one appends "equation".
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
e93893d | 15812: corrections of language |
There remains at least one "laplace" without capitals
Solve an ODE using laplace transforms
There also remains at least one typo "singlar"
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
e03b5c8 | 15812: more typos fixed |
Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton, Karl-Dieter Crisman
chapoton, I'm happy with this now in principle - if you find the documentation still builds correctly, it shouldn't affect any doctests so you can change to positive review.
ok, then good to go.
Changed branch from u/rws/ticket/15812 to e03b5c8
Several omissions of articles, wording, and typos need to be fixed in this highly visible module.
Component: documentation
Keywords: calculus documentation
Author: Ralf Stephan
Branch/Commit:
e03b5c8
Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton, Karl-Dieter Crisman
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15812