Closed a1dd0ea6-9300-4f97-bb3c-0f25ba420caf closed 9 years ago
Hi again
Is the code ok now? Or what remains to be done?
Best Jonas
Changed branch from u/jj/triangle_conjugacy to u/vdelecroix/16976
I had to merge with 6.6.beta1 because of a trivial merge conflict due to #17694
You should really think about cleaning before implementing anything else. I already made many remarks about that are here are more:
The code of MatrixGroupElement
is done in such way that there is no need to write a custom __init__
. You only need to implement a ._matrix_check
in the parent.
There is a .gitignore
file in sage/modular/modform_hecketriangle/
because of
commit c8cbd7acfc81bdc1c24684f26d986f59491e0a3a
Author: Martin Raum <martin@raum-brothers.eu>
Date: Thu May 8 16:32:54 2014 +0200
Rename folder for Hecke triangle modforms.
Vincent
New commits:
6d73481 | merge sage-6.6.beta1 in #16976 |
New commits:
7dcee34 | remove .gitignore, add further explanations on `__init__`, change ValueError to TypeError for element checks |
Changed branch from u/vdelecroix/16976 to u/jj/triangle_conjugacy
Changed branch from u/jj/triangle_conjugacy to 7dcee34
The ticket adds several new features to Hecke triangle groups (resp. elements):
Some remarks:
Depends on #16936
CC: @videlec
Component: modular forms
Keywords: hecke triangle group conjugacy class rational period function
Author: Jonas Jermann
Branch/Commit:
7dcee34
Reviewer: Vincent Delecroix
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16976