cython spyx files -- cinclude, clib, issues

[williamstein]

There are some issues with cython spyx files:

1. There is still nothing in the documentation anywhere in sage about cinclude, clib, etc. Here's a hint:

Basically you put
# clang c
# clib  cblas
# cfile myfile.c
# cinclude "/usr/local/include"

Questions -- where can one put these? Must the # be there?
However this is documented, at a bare minimum typing

sage: cython?
sage: load?
sage: attach?

should give enough information to find docs that clearly explain this cinclude, etc. directives.

2. Create a file a.pxi and a file b.pyx. Put one of the # directives in the .pxi file and include the pxi file in the pyx file. The directive is ignored. This caused a ton of confusion today.

CC: @malb @robertwb

Component: user interface

Reviewer: Jeroen Demeyer

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/1994

[williamstein]

Description changed:

--- 
+++ 
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 # clang c
 # clib  cblas
 # cfile myfile.c
-# cinclude super.h standard.h
+# cinclude "/usr/local/include"

Questions -- where can one put these? Must the # be there?
However this is documented, at a bare minimum typing

[kedlaya]

comment:2

Is there also a directive ccflags (analogous to cflags in C)? For instance, in order to compile an spkg using FLINT, one needs a line like

#ccflags -std=c99

[85eec1a4-3d04-4b4d-b711-d4db03337c41]

comment:3

(1) should have been dealt via #3530, i.e. the documentation of the pragmas.

(2) is potentially still valid and I am not sure whose fault it is: Sage or Cython.

I am adding Martin and Robert to the CC field here.

Cheers,

Michael

[malb]

comment:4

Actually, (1) is not dealt with since it isn't necessarily easy to get to the new documentation. That should be addressed.

[kcrisman]

comment:5

Note that this stackoverflow.com post points to this ticket. Apparently this is still something that could be documented within Sage better?

[jdemeyer]

Reviewer: Jeroen Demeyer

[jdemeyer]

comment:10

Those directives should be deprecated anyway: #22461

[embray]

comment:12

Closing tickets in the sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix module with positive_review (i.e. someone has confirmed they should be closed).