thecaligarmo
commented
5 years ago Description changed:
---
+++
@@ -1 +1,26 @@
+When using `latex(Tableau([[1]]))` we normally get back:
+```
+{\def\lr#1{\multicolumn{1}{|@{\hspace{.6ex}}c@{\hspace{.6ex}}|}
+{\raisebox{-.3ex}{$#1$}}}
+ \raisebox{-.6ex}{$\begin{array}[b]{*{1}c}\cline{1-1}
+ \lr{1}\\\cline{1-1}
+ \end{array}$}
+}
+```
+
+This is normally except when using sagetex. When sagetex runs, it encodes everything in
+
+```
+\newlabel{@sageinline0}{
+ .... code goes here ...
+}
+```
+
+This is normally ok except that in `\newlabel` we can't have `\def\lr#1` (in particular we need `##1` instead of `#1`)
+
+This ticket proposes adding a new function called `sagetex()` which is like `latex()` in that objects can define a `_sagetex_` method and when `sagetex()` is called, the `_sagetex_` method is called, and if not present, it runs `latex()` instead.
+
+After this implementation, we'd propose a change to sagetex (the latex package) in order to use the `sagetex()` function instead of the `latex()` function.
+
+The reason we have decided this method is to try and allow more flexibility in the future. In particular, (as a use case other than adding proper definition embedding) if we ever want the code in `latex()` versus `sagetex()` to be vastly different, this would allow us to do that. Additionally, we chose not to do a grep replace of `#x` to `##x` (for x increasing) is due to the fact that there is a use case in which the user might actually want to keep `#1` and not have it escaped.
7ed8c4ca-6d56-4ae9-953a-41e42b4ed313
embray
mkoeppe
When using
latex(Tableau([[1]]))we normally get back:This is normally except when using sagetex. When sagetex runs, it encodes everything in
This is normally ok except that in
\newlabelwe can't have\def\lr#1(in particular we need##1instead of#1). This means when using the code\sage{Tableau([[1]])}in latex causes problems and doesn't allow compilation.This ticket proposes adding a new function called
sagetex()which is likelatex()in that objects can define a_sagetex_method and whensagetex()is called, the_sagetex_method is called, and if not present, it runslatex()instead.After this implementation, we'd propose a change to sagetex (the latex package) in order to use the
sagetex()function instead of thelatex()function.The reason we have decided this method is to try and allow more flexibility in the future. In particular, (as a use case other than adding proper definition embedding) if we ever want the code in
latex()versussagetex()to be vastly different, this would allow us to do that. Additionally, we chose not to do a grep replace of#xto##x(for x increasing) is due to the fact that there is a use case in which the user might actually want to keep#1and not have it escaped.Component: packages: standard
Keywords: sagetex
Author: aram.dermenjian
Branch/Commit: u/aram.dermenjian/definitions_and_commands_in_sagetex @
dedc356Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27543