Open GMS103 opened 3 years ago
In https://cocalc.com, which has
sage: version()
'SageMath version 9.2, Release Date: 2020-10-24'
the results are the same.
In 9.3.beta7, it is no longer the same. However, the und
might come from the -1
.
If we consider limit((a)^x*exp(ln(x)),oo)
or limit((a)^x*x,oo)
, for 0<a<1
the limit is 0, whereas for 1<a
, the limit is Infinity
.
Also, I think Infinity
is specifically Unsigned Infinity
.
If this is actually a bug, it is a Maxima bug.
Moving this ticket to 9.4, as it seems unlikely that it will be merged in 9.3, which is in the release candidate stage
Tested with https://sagecell.sagemath.org (sorry, I do not have access to 9.2 yet).
These two results seem to me inconsistent with one another:
(if I understand well, the first means "complex infinity", and the second "undefined").
Adding
assume(x,'integer')
orassume(x>0)
seems to have no effet.Component: calculus
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30853