Open BenjaminMoraga opened 1 month ago
Please provide code that illustrates the issue, because I am not seeing it. There is no thinspace here:
sage: x,y = var("x y")
sage: latex(x * y)
x y
Actually, I think perhaps the default should be to have thinspace because, unlike in usual mathematics, sagemath routinely allows variables to have more than one letter, e.g.:
sage: var("distance rate time")
(distance, rate, time)
sage: latex(distance == rate * time)
\mathit{distance} = \mathit{rate} \mathit{time}
I think there should be something between the two variables on the right-hand side. Probably it should be \times
, but a space would be better than nothing.
You are right, there is no thin space between the product of two variables. I think that behaviour is desirable, because most of the times we use one letter variables and is better for copy/paste on LaTeX source. The problem is the inconsistency with the product between an integer and a symbolic variable:
sage: latex(2*x)
2 \, x
I think that the default should be non thin space between coeficients and variables, similar to products of variables. But a function to control that representation should be implemented.
Problem Description
When writing mathematics, it is usual to denote the product $xy$ between two symbolic variables $x$ and $y$ just by concatenation; this also aplies to the product of a number and a symbolic variable like $2x$. In Sagemath, the latex representation of a product introduce a thin non-separation space between both variables, say $x\, y$ and $2\, x$, respectively. Although this is acceptable, and may be also prefered by some authors, I think there should be an easy manner to modify this behaviour. Also, I would change the default behaviour.
Proposed Solution
Add a method to
latex
that modifies the representation of products asmatrix_delimiters
change delimiters of a matrix. Also, the default behaviour should be plain concatenation.Alternatives Considered
Add a global option that change the way products are represented.
Additional Information
No response
Is there an existing issue for this?