Open dimpase opened 1 month ago
marked #38219 as disputed - as this has been discussed, as a part of my proposal on sage-devel, and rejected. Now it is resurrected without any credit to me and to these discussions.
Would you review #38219? You may use #38551 specifically created for those who are blocked from the PR.
If you have objections, please express them in a way that the author may respond. Being explicit may help.
Sorry for your inconvenience.
Unfortunately the author seems to completely ignore anything I do, so this looks like a waste of time.
I have marked #38219 as "needs work"
the credits are not given
pip has functionality to deal with hashes for binary wheels, but the PR appears to do something else, and it looks as an unnecessary complexity being added
We have had a bitter fight over whether standard packages can be binary wheel packages, which was my proposal for e.g. pytest.
This is not even mentioned in #38219 - and these working on #38219 were against my proposal. I would like to know what happened and why such a change of heart?
Originally posted by @kwankyu in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/38219#issuecomment-2219371509