search

sagemath / sagetex

Embed code, results of computations, and plots from the Sage mathematics software suite (https://www.sagemath.org) into LaTeX documents. Source repository for https://pypi.org/project/sagetex/ and https://ctan.org/pkg/sagetex
https://ctan.org/pkg/sagetex
Other
58 stars 22 forks source link

Remove references to Sage installation guide #17

Closed kcrisman closed 5 years ago

kcrisman commented 5 years ago

This is not correct any more:

See the Sage installation guide at http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/

So we need to update this: see downstream at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22499

It does seem that the pdfs are still installed though, which is good.

kcrisman commented 5 years ago

See also https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21450

kcrisman commented 5 years ago

@dimpase This is still incorrect; the installation guide has no references to SageTeX any more, I think.

dimpase commented 5 years ago

Do you mean the installation guide of SageTeX? Or of Sage? There are two separate things here: installation of SageTeX python component, and making TeX aware of SageTeX. Which one do you mean?

kcrisman commented 5 years ago

I mean the installation guide of Sage has no references to SageTeX, to my knowledge.

tutorial $ grep -i sagetex *.rst | wc 
      66     595    4658
tutorial $ cd ../installation/
installation $ grep -i sagetex *.rst | wc 
       0       0       0

So the README for SageTeX in this repo that we are commenting on should change that.

More details: of the 4 files changed in #5 two are in fine shape now. The README change I think I can try to make a manual PR for right now; the sagetex.dtx one I would worry about making a syntax error if I did it by hand. I'll do at least the first immediately.

dimpase commented 5 years ago

That's correct. I must say I'm not happy with the status of docs of sagetex - if sagetex is upstream w.r.t. sage, it should get its docs built separately, and installed into the same place as e.g. sagenb.

kcrisman commented 5 years ago

Hmm, I'm not sure how to fix that. I guess that in principle there are two options:

Anyway, that would be a separate issue; to be picky, it would be a Sage issue which Sage asks SageTeX to take care of ... it all seems a bit silly to me, though.

dimpase commented 5 years ago

TeX ought to be a dependency of SageTeX. Not sure how to handle this, in particular as not only LaTeX is needed, but also certain LaTeX packages.

Inability to build SageTeX docs is a good test for usefulness of SageTeX installation, so it is good to have it built from source...

On 8 Jan 2019 3:31 pm, "kcrisman" notifications@github.com wrote:

Hmm, I'm not sure how to fix that. I guess that in principle there are two options:

Anyway, that would be a separate issue; to be picky, it would be a Sage issue which Sage asks SageTeX to take care of ... it all seems a bit silly to me, though.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sagemath/sagetex/issues/17#issuecomment-452340198, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABN8HE4qYsKnrMNxlAOWdwdGB2hoWsbVks5vBLnJgaJpZM4XwUiz .

kcrisman commented 5 years ago

Both PRs were merged so I'm closing this. I'll open a new one for this other discussion.