Closed kwankyu closed 1 year ago
Though the comment links are rewritten to use the fragment URL, at least on some tickets, ticket comments refer to earlier ticket comments by number without using the correct format.
Now I understand this. So the comment numbers are useful.
But perhaps if it is followed by the "Replying to [...]" message, the "\n" can be suppressed?
I don't know. But perhaps we should be consistent...
Let's see how the comment numbers are shown in GES.
I think there's no need to keep the format "comment:123" because we replace all occurrences of this format when it appears in links. How about "Comment 123:"?
The converted issues in GES look somewhat different than in migration archive. Let's see how it looks.
Will we see all tickets in GES soon?
Will we see all tickets in GES soon?
Yes, the conversion is running. It's taking quite a few hours for the full run. It's at 70% now...
Could we see some converted issues with comment numbers in GES by a run separate from the current full run?
Apart from the last line in the changes for the issue #107, other changes are just refactoring to clean up things.