Generation of test case data for Scala and Java, in the spirit of QuickCheck. When your test fails, it gives you a minimised failing test case and a way of reproducing the failure immediately.
MIT License
15
stars
1
forks
source link
Support automatic derivation of `Trials<X>` for a structured X in Java. #6
On the Scala side, there is already support for automatic derivation of Trials[X] where X is some algebraic data type that heads a hierarchy of sum and product types - courtesy of Magnolia - nice job there.
What we lack is the same experience on the Java side - and for that matter for classes in Scala that are not sum / product types, ie. 'conventional OO classes in Scala'.
One approach would be to use the public constructors of X to guide the assembly of a Trials<X>, using a mixture of reflection and ByteBuddy for the implementation.
Ideally this should work for both Java and Scala code, although Java is the priority here.
On the Scala side, there is already support for automatic derivation of
Trials[X]whereXis some algebraic data type that heads a hierarchy of sum and product types - courtesy of Magnolia - nice job there.What we lack is the same experience on the Java side - and for that matter for classes in Scala that are not sum / product types, ie. 'conventional OO classes in Scala'.
One approach would be to use the public constructors of
Xto guide the assembly of aTrials<X>, using a mixture of reflection and ByteBuddy for the implementation.Ideally this should work for both Java and Scala code, although Java is the priority here.