Open RoyiAvital opened 8 years ago
Generally it is some modifications related to image transforms as well as parameters. But the algorithms stay the same.
I see. Are results on the Paper produced using the current code or the one in the Paper?
By the way, your University page with the PDF isn't available anymore.
The result in the original paper is not produced with this code. The original code is in C++ and it is too messy. But they generally produce the same result.
I have left the university now. Currently I haven't built a new personal webpage.
So is the "Scene Level Intrinsic Decomposition" (Sec. 4 of your paper) part of this code? I would like to reproduce the intrinsic images results, but from the demo file I only understand how to get the "Image Flattening" step in Fig. 7, not the full pipeline. If it is implemented, could you give me a hint, what I have to define as param?
I would like to get back to my last question. Could you please elaborate on that? I plan to evaluate your intrinsic decomposition method on another dataset. Therefore, I need the full intrinsic decomposition pipeline of your method. Could you help me with that? Thanks!
@tnestmeyer I noticed in your paper that you are comparing with this approach. Did you manage to find the code for the whole pipeline including the reflectance/shading estimation? And if yes can I get it from somewhere.
@TheodoreT Sorry, can't help you there. In the end I used the results available for IIW at the public project page, so I did not evaluate the method on any other datasets.
@tnestmeyer ,
Something is wrong with the README.md
file.
Things aren't shown properly.
@RoyiAvital You mean in this repo, correct? I saw that myself, too, but I am neither the Owner of, nor related to this project. You probably want to address @soundsilence for fixing it.
@tnestmeyer I see. Thanks for the feedback.
Hi, You mention it is different than the article. Could you say what is different and why?
Thank You.