Open diogomribeiro opened 2 years ago
Hi @diogomribeiro,
We haven't seen this error before. is 1:1:C:T in the testing set too? If true, conditioning markers on themselves sometimes causes problem, especially when the conditioning variance is very close to zero.
Thanks, Wei
Hi Wei, thanks for the reply. 1:1:C:T is not on the testing set (groupfile). It is only on the VCF. The problem seems to occur if there is only one variant in the condition. For instance, --condition=1:1:C:T does not work, but --condition=1:1:C:T,1:2:A:G works fine. And as I said before, just simply modifying the ID of the variant (1:1:C:T to 1:1:CC:T) without modifying the genotypes themselves also works. That is why I was thinking, it could be a problem with parsing the string?
Thanks, Diogo
Hi there,
I'm using SAIGE v1.0.4 with conditional analysis. This works well when I have a set of variants, but when there is only one variant in the condition (e.g. --condition=1:1:C:T) I get this error: "Error in mainRegionInCPP(genoType, region$genoIndex_prev, region$genoIndex, : Error in function boost::math::cdf(const chi_squared_distribution&, double): Chi Square parameter was -nan, but must be > 0 ! Calls: SPAGMMATtest -> SAIGE.Region -> mainRegionInCPP"
Weirdly, if there is a single variant in the condition but it is an indel (e.g. --condition=1:1:CC:T), this works fine. I wonder if there is an issue when parsing the condition string.
If you need more information let me know. Thanks!