Closed gfudenberg closed 2 years ago
Thanks!
The input format is 'dd-mm-yyyy' which then gets converted to 'yyyy/mm/dd'. Internally, the logic looks correct, but the results indeed look incorrect. Any clues @bscrow?
Thank you @gfudenberg for the bug report! You are right that the month and date fields have been swapped. On the SRA server, date format in the form of 02/01/2021 is interpreted as mm/dd/yyyy instead of dd/mm/yyyy, which I missed. This should be resolved in #146.
Thanks @bscrow for the PR!
@gfudenberg, you should be able to clone from the master branch to test the fix, I will make a release in the coming weeks.
Thanks for the great tool!
I wonder if the month & date are swapped for the
publication_date
argument inSraSearch
, since I find fewer entries with a date range from '01-01-2021:01-02-2021' vs '01-01-2021:02-01-2021'.Note the function nevertheless throws an error for e.g. 29-01-2021
In [2]: pysradb.version Out[2]: '1.0.1'