sakuraclamp / arducopter

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/arducopter
0 stars 0 forks source link

CH6 tuning option shows only Min or Max, nothing in between. #458

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
MP v1.1.99/v1.2, ACv2.6 (and v2.7)

Quote from wiki (http://code.google.com/p/arducopter/wiki/AC2_Tweaks): "...To 
test that the values are changing: move the lever or knob then click 'Refresh 
Params', the value should be displayed in the center pane in the respective 
box, move it again and click 'Refresh Params' again, the value should've 
changed. Alternatively select the Terminal tab, type 'test' and then 'tune' and 
your value will scroll down in the window, adjust the knob or lever to see the 
values change."

If I enter 4.000 and 5.500 as min/max then click Write Params then type 'test' 
and 'tune' the values show ONLY 4.000 min or 5.500 max, there are NO increments 
in between when moving the CH6 lever. (My pulse width for that channel is 
1024-2099ms)

(Issue moved from incorrect project: Arduplane)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by graham.d...@gmail.com on 29 Jul 2012 at 5:34

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
It's working correctly now

Original comment by graham.d...@gmail.com on 15 Aug 2012 at 8:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Hi Graham,
it was working well on Mission Planner 1.2.12 via 3dRadio
After installing MP 1.2.13 the tunig option failed, and so did MP 1.2.14, it 
reacts like you describe it above.
Is the "knob" on channel 6 possibly read as a "switch" - that could explain the 
behaviour?
Greetings, Hans-Jochen

Original comment by derlange...@web.de on 6 Oct 2012 at 7:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Hi Graham,
found out what was wrong: ch6 min was 1498 and ch6 max was 1499.
As I calibrated channel 6 once on installing the 3dradio, i am shure it 
happened during an installation of version 1.2.13 or 1.2.14. Now fixed the rc6 
min/max-values on 1100 and 1900 and everything works fine.  
Should there be placed a process improvement: no changes on calibration values 
during installing procedures? 
Greetings, Hans-Jochen

Original comment by derlange...@web.de on 8 Oct 2012 at 9:27