Closed michaelweilsalesforce closed 5 years ago
Merging #348 into master will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #348 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 86.65% 86.65%
========================================
Files 335 335
Lines 10763 10763
Branches 344 562 +218
========================================
Hits 9327 9327
Misses 1436 1436
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
...alesforce/op/filters/RawFeatureFilterResults.scala | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
...a/com/salesforce/op/filters/RawFeatureFilter.scala | 92.93% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update afc910c...a8e7794. Read the comment docs.
Thanks for the contribution! It looks like @mweilsalesforce is an internal user so signing the CLA is not required. However, we need to confirm this.
Related issues
FeatureDistribution
contains the fieldkey
which is the map key associated with distribution (when the feature is a map). But why not having the same field inRawFeatureFilterMetrics
andExclusionReasons
?Describe the proposed solution Adding the same field in
RawFeatureFilterMetrics
andExclusionReasons
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context