salesforce / rules_spring

Bazel rule for building Spring Boot apps as a deployable jar
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
224 stars 48 forks source link

Rename GitHub repo from bazel-springboot-rule to rules_spring #97

Closed plaird closed 3 years ago

plaird commented 3 years ago

This is a necessary final step for #30 The Git repo naming convention dictated by Bazel for public rules is rules_technology, where technology for our case is Spring. So our repo should be rules_spring. (note the underscore not a hyphen).

Up until recently, our scope was just springboot, so the rename could be rules_springboot. But if we implement #93 (SpringNative) we cover more than just Spring Boot in Bazel. So naming our repo rules_spring seems to be the right long term move.

I have done some local testing using a test repo, and here is what I found when we rename this repo:

Therefore, the GitHub repo rename should be transparent to all builds and existing documentation links.