Open aozalevsky opened 6 months ago
@aozalevsky auth_seq_id
can be standardized if it is present in atom_site
. If it is not, then it is difficult to fix it.
Using it in pdbx_poly_seq_scheme
when it is not present in atom_site
is misleading. The correction here would be to remove it completely (or replace with a ?
). Would molprobity be able to handle that?
Several entries have duplicated
auth_seq_id
:Here is an example from PDBDEV_00000051:
1) It seems that it doesn't violate a dictionary format, but doesn't it violate a policy? @brindakv
2) It introduces a lot of problems for the analysis with tools relying on
auth_seq_id
(e.g., molprobity)See the examples attached.
PDBDEV_00000053.log PDBDEV_00000051.log PDBDEV_00000052.log