Open aozalevsky opened 6 months ago
@brindakv no action needed now, but we might want to update these entries in the future.
PDBDEV_00000089 is unclear from the paper. Modeling details are in the Appendix 01 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2201910120#supplementary-materials
PDBDEV_00000098:
If a majority of structures in a cluster exhibit the inter-residue distance values within the Cα-Cα distance range the cross-linkers cover (BS3 with Cα-Cα distance <30 Å; DMTMM with Cα-Cα distance <16 Å),53
Seems like Ca-Ca (thus can be updated to by-residue
), but entry has 30 and 10A thresholds, while the text says 30 and 16.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969212623000321?via%3Dihub
PDBDEV_0000020X series used Cb-Cb restraints:
The 136 hits from thiol trapping experiments representing pairs of receptor-arrestin positions at an estimated maximal Cβ-Cβ distance of about 10.2 Å (Fig. 2b) were translated into 136 soft harmonic restraints weighted by the corresponding crosslinking yields in an integrative modeling framework47,48,49.
Thanks @aozalevsky This can be addressed during remediation.
@brindakv 9a3i (PDBDEV_00000203), 9a3j (PDBDEV_00000204), 9a3k (PDBDEV_00000205), 9a3l (PDBDEV_00000206), 9a3m (PDBDEV_00000207), 9a3n (PDBDEV_00000208) are still incorrect.
Right now they all are 'by-residue':
#
loop_
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.asym_id_1
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.asym_id_2
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.atom_id_1
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.atom_id_2
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.comp_id_1
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.comp_id_2
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.conditional_crosslink_flag
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.distance_threshold
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.entity_id_1
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.entity_id_2
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.group_id
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.id
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.model_granularity
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.pseudo_site_flag
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.psi
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.restraint_type
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.seq_id_1
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.seq_id_2
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.sigma_1
_ihm_cross_link_restraint.sigma_2
C A . . ALA TYR ANY 10.2 3 1 1 1 by-residue . . "upper bound" 287 249 . .
but according to my previous comment they should be by-atom
and between CB
and CB
Here is one example (
PDBDEV_00000089
):If the
atomic
restraint is missing the atom label, such restraint can't be properly assessed. I don't consider this a problem because the default behavior is to ignore any missing/incomplete data. I've noticed it only because "at a glance" plots were failing. I've added a workaround for reports.The issue is just a note that we might want to address in the future. For instance, they can be updated to
by-residue
.Here is a full list of affected entries: PDBDEV_00000089, PDBDEV_00000098, PDBDEV_00000203, PDBDEV_00000204, PDBDEV_00000205, PDBDEV_00000206, PDBDEV_00000207, PDBDEV_00000208