Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I don't know if showing the error stack trace to a user of GoogleCL is how this
should be handled. If anything, the exception should be handled internally and
present a reasonable error message to the user via stderr.
Another thought is to have a --debug switch allowing to view stack traces, etc.
Owners, what are your thoughts?
Original comment by ericvw
on 28 Jun 2010 at 1:32
The patch's target is to avoid crashing the shell and solve annoying shell
re-runs.
I agree that is desirable to give better feedback and to hide the stack-trace
when something wrong happens but that involves a deeper analysis on the way of
handle feedback on options, arguments and exceptions.
Waiting for owners feedback...
Original comment by ferranb@gmail.com
on 28 Jun 2010 at 8:47
Ultimately, the stack trace will be hidden from the user. But since we're still
in beta, it's valuable for the user to easily report the entire stack trace to
us.
This also helps the windows exe in issue 54. Well timed. :)
Original comment by tom.h.mi...@gmail.com
on 30 Jun 2010 at 3:13
This issue was closed by revision r313.
Original comment by tom.h.mi...@gmail.com
on 30 Jun 2010 at 3:28
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ferranb@gmail.com
on 27 Jun 2010 at 11:11Attachments: