Closed tomkis closed 7 years ago
Is the goal to have the library name still be redux-*
or completely abstract?
Yes that's the goal. We were thinking of redux-fractal
.
Great library! Here are some ideas:
redux-wrap redux-nested
Here's a wild one: refrakt! Unfortunately, refract is already taken: https://www.npmjs.com/package/refract
I really like refract and because it looks like the name is taken by some active library we might want to use name refractor which is obviously taken too however the repo doesn't seem very active.
How about then refractal?
Or maybe reactal.
Fractal is about symmetry: resym
Fractal is about a pattern that repeats itself: repattern, repat
Library has been renamed to prism
not redux-prism
since technically it's not related only to redux but react as well.
@tomkis are you sure that prism
is the right naming choice? There is already well known http://prismjs.com/ library which will make any topic related to this repository hard to find with Google.
When I was presenting
redux-elm
@ reactive vienna I guess that @ryyppy had a good point about inconsistency betweenredux-elm
and elm 17+ which has removed some concepts (FRP) and did slight changes in component composition. FunctionforwardTo
has been removed and replaced byApp.map
which goal is technically still the same.Anyway, after re-thinking everything we can now declare that
redux-elm
andelm
shares just idea of fractability by utilizing component composition. This is hardly the most important part of Elm.The long term goal has always been renaming the library and distancing from original Elm architecture since we don't want to blindly copy what already exists.
I filed this issue and would appreciate any feedback on this + possible name suggestions.