Open darkpixel opened 4 years ago
@darkpixel Appreciate the report, would you mind preparing a PR, similar to the one that upgraded to bind911
a couple of years back (#91)?
I'm not a FreeBSD user so I don't know the packages naming schema it uses, but is there a virtual with a standarized name that has the 'latest version' as a dependecy?
Ie, bind9
which installs 'whichever bind9xx version is the current one' as a dependency?
Nope. You have to manually specify which package version you want. For example, they have two salt packages: 'py27-salt' and 'py37-salt'. If you want to upgrade or change versions, you need to explicitly make the change. You wouldn't want your server automatically changing major or minor package versions on you and breaking something. (Security updates aren't considered a major or minor version change).
oh, well smile Then, if you can add those 2 lines @daks suggested in the
pillar.example
and ammend the commit subject, we'll be OK to merge. Thanks!
@javierbertoli Was this comment intended for https://github.com/saltstack-formulas/apt-formula/pull/64?
Yeah. Sorry for the noise :roll_eyes:
https://github.com/saltstack-formulas/bind-formula/blob/e398d7cbd58b7fce0293e2a2ebe349db4d986bd8/bind/map.jinja#L79
The bind911 package is deprecated and the formula should probably default to the bind916 package.